🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a large but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the impassioned discussion over their destiny often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near the famous falls where they are kept stated it would consider to end their lives unless the authorities pays for the cost of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious position.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and group interactions suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something one caretaker learned first-hand.

She spent three years as a beluga trainer, a position that involved earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so surprised by the details and unique traits in their dispositions. She formed a special affection for a pair of whales with different natures.

“Eve chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s relationship with the whales evolved against a background of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her time at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, died. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility attributes to natural mortality, but which advocates say reflects the poor conditions in which they were kept.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the closure. “Structural materials is breaking off from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not respond to a inquiry, but previously stated: “The whales … get far higher quality medical attention and 24/7 care than any individual in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was fired from the facility in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the facility suspected particulars of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was let go not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any efforts to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “considerable staff”, trucks and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for demands for the whales to be taken immediately from the park, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.

In recent months, Canada’s fisheries minister rejected a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the request would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an transfer that would prolong the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s comments reveal a more general lack of awareness of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As officials struggle to find a resolution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for local populations.

A suggested sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which now received regulatory clearance, has shown to be contentious. The planned facility, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could eventually represent a permanent solution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the prospect of a sanctuary reflects a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a workable approach in the short term.

An official, leader of the plan, said the facility will simulate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales receive from trainers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|