🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.